If Autocomplete remains on when one translates, it becomes cluttered with irrelevant suggestions when working outside the project, as well as with entries that are relevant outside the project but are pointless withing the project. Personally, I have found it annoying and distracting. The function that analyzes everything one types and then offers suggestions to save typing.
Phraseexpress basic professional#
I believe the feature in PhraseExpress Professional that clashed with Studio's Autosuggest is Autocomplete. The integrated Clipboard manager is also very convenient and in most cases saves running another tool. no contractions and abbreviations) and I find it easier to manage all of this on a more powerful tool than AHK. I also like to use the text expansion tool as a system-wide auto-correct library for common typos or for different writing styles (contractions and abbreviations vs. minimize, accidental expansions and replacements. Maybe I'll write a blog post about how I categorize different types of phrase using prefixes to prevent, well. There are ways to logically separate different categories of phrases, which is something I recommend in general, but to me it's still not ideal It's could also a little bit of hassle when having to frequently add or manage phrases. They could be baked into it, no doubt, but it takes some doing (or maybe there is more advanced AHK scripts available out there already.
From a certain number of phrases (which, I admit, changes between people) it could even become counter-productive as most people will resort to using only handful of common/memorable phrases.Īlso, the simple AHK script lacks some powerful functions, such as inserting dates, date calculations, inserting the clipboard content, and so on. From my experience, relying on mnemonics alone is somewhat limiting. However, I think that a more powerful tool could come in handy even in relatively simple use cases.
For straightforward text expansion one doesn't need to look further and you can't beat the price either. It does adjust as you type and might change the suggestions based on the last word you've inputted, but it is more of a blunt instrument that works best on a sentence rather than a word level.īut again, I haven't experimented with it for quite a while and maybe it got better at doing what you are looking for.ĪHK is definitely great, Nora. But it's different (but also similar) from the autosuggest/autocompletion you find on mobile devices. For e-mails or any other type of boiler plate documents I prefer to use templates.įrom what I can remember it worked decent enough and started suggesting relevant(-ish) sentences after a few days of use. I'm not a fan of Autocomplete for e-mails, and when I use Studio I relay on it's own AutoSuggest (with UpLift) functionality, which I find good. I haven't experimented with it much, but it basically captures and analyzes everything you type, later suggesting you sentences and even paragraphs for auto-completion. If memory serves, I believe it's included with the Professional version. PhraseExpress has an Autocomplete functionality. It doesn't go on sale very often, so I thought of sharing this here in case someone might be interested. I'm sharing this only because Phrase Express Professional is offered today on Bitsdujour at a 50% discount ($69.97) ( ). I'm by no mean trying to belittle or dismiss AHK or any other text expension tool. Especially when it goes on sale the integrated Clipboard manager in particular is done well and a nice bonus for basic Clipboard management needs that saves on running and marinating a separate tool). Eventually I've settled on PhraseExpress Professional a couple of years ago because I believe it offers the best value in terms of functionality vs. Whether they lacked the functionality to create forms (a template with one or more user input fields) at what I consider a reasonable price point, lacked Autocomplete functionality (at all or at a reasonable price point) or, in the case of AHK, offered only basic functionality and adding strings on the go was a bit of a hassle.
While I t hink all of them are good, I've also found some of them lacking just enough to make me want to look for a a little more polished alternative. Over the years I've tried several text expansion tools (Breevy, PhraseExpender, AutoHotKey scripts, and few others).
Phraseexpress basic full#
Less so in this particular group, maybe, but I don't believe most people are even aware of it, let alone using its full potential. Text expansion/replacement is somewhat of an unsung productivity aid.
0 kommentar(er)
